Accountability – What Leaders Can Learn from Pilots

In an earlier post, I explored the interesting notion of the value of pilot training for leaders. My post was a follow up to a study citing a possible correlation between effective corporate leadership and general aviation training.

The importance of accountability is widely discussed in leadership circles.  Strong leaders are said to “hold themselves accountable for results” and “drive a sense of accountability in others.” But what, exactly, does accountability mean?

The textbook definition of accountability is, “a form of trustworthiness; the trait of being answerable to someone for something or being responsible for one's conduct.” In other words, accountability is the opposite of blame-shifting. In its simplest terms, accountability means, “the buck stops here.”

Few professions rise to the level of accountability that is expected of pilots. The Federal Aviation Regulations (FARs), essentially the rules of aviation, contain a clause that illustrates this point. FAR 91.3 states: “the pilot in command of an aircraft is directly responsible for, and is the final authority as to, the operation of that aircraft.”

The authority imparted in FAR 91.3 represents the ultimate level of responsibility and accountability. As a result, the vast majority of aviation incidents or accidents are attributed to pilot error. Even in cases of well-documented extenuating circumstances such as weather or equipment malfunction, the primary cause of aviation accidents is most frequently determined to be pilot error. The consequences of pilot error are often severe, including suspension of license, job loss and occasionally, litigation.

The pilot in command is accountable for the safety of the flight

Imagine if a similar standard was applied in the world of leadership. Consider how often “leadership error” would be cited as the root cause of business problems. How would the business world be different if leaders could not invoke the usual litany of excuses such as “lack of systems support,” “not enough time” or “external economic forces” when things go wrong?

Here are four common workplace challenges. Envision how companies would be different if leaders, as well as the people and boards to whom they report, held themselves accountable:

1.      Chronically poor performing employee: Common excuse: "It's not my fault. He's lazy." Accountable leader's questions: "Did I fail to convey understandable expectations, monitor performance and swiftly intervene with coaching and guidance?"

2.      Disengaged new employee: Common excuse: "No one could have seen this. She interviewed so well and had great references." Accountable leader's questions: "Did I fail to carefully assess cultural and organizational fit? Did I fail to provide an effective orientation and onboarding experience? Did I fail to connect and guide the newcomer?"

3.      Sub-standard project progress: Common excuse: "I'm not responsible. This group is just not motivated." Accountable leader's questions: "Did I fail to provide clear project guidelines, appropriate project oversight, and closely monitor team dynamics?"

4.      Need to lay off staff: Common excuse: "We have no other choice. Market conditions and economic trends are impacting the company." Accountable leader's questions: "Did I lack strategic foresight? Was I paying sufficient attention to income and revenue trends? Did I exhaust all other options before impacting my employees' lives?"

Here’s a challenge to every leader, from CEO to first-line supervisor: Dust off your job description. Review the expectations and responsibilities of your position. Apply the principles of FAR 91.3 to every facet of your work. You, as a leader, are directly responsible for the operation of your group, department or organization, depending on the level of your job. When things go wrong – and they will – stop short of looking for other sources of blame and accept the responsibility at the same level that pilots do.

The buck stops with you. It will be uncomfortable and difficult, but nothing is more disarming or builds trust faster than a strong leader who accepts responsibility and models accountability.

Recommended readings for this post are: The Speed of Trust: The One Thing That Changes Everything, by Stephen M. R. Covey and The Limits of Expertise: Rethinking Pilot Error and the Causes of Airline Accidents, by R. Key Dismukes, Benjamin A. Berman and Loukia D. Loukopoulos.

The Speed of Trust discusses the importance quickly establishing trust to facilitate leadership effectiveness. Although "The Limits of Expertise" focuses on aviation, its message has relevance for decision processes, performance and errors of humans in many professions.